Let’s suppose that a compliance system is $12,000 per year. Is that expensive?
The answer depends on what it replaces.
If automating the collection of evidence in a complicated technology system eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious work, it could be a well-spent amount of money. The calculation would be different when a team of seven people could collect similar evidence in only one or two minutes per month.
This is a good method of looking for an Vanta alternative. Asking which platform has the most advanced features isn’t the first step. Consider what these features can allow your company to save time and work.
Automated Manufacturing has a Break-Even Level
Compliance automation isn’t inherently either good or negative. The benefits of compliance automation changes as the company grows. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company with multiple cloud environments as well as various applications. Gathering evidence manually can become a serious operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and take evidence are able to justify the cost.
Consider a startup with 10 employees getting ready for its first SOC 2. Imagine a startup having 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of a high-end platform are impressive, however they only offer financial value in the event that an organization requires them.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both are trusted software for compliance that is built around automation and integrations. As such, they can be compared in terms of supported frameworks including integrations, service agreements, and individual quotes can be useful for organizations who are looking for a similar approach.
There’s another decision to make first. Are you interested in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Some businesses favor continuous monitoring as well as automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Some companies prefer to create evidence on their own, particularly in cases of low workload.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Utilize the Same Model
A number of famous Vanta competitors compete within the same category of automation. There are also platforms that have a more minimalist design which are focused more on the system’s organization, rather instead of connectivity.
CertAssist is part of this group. CertAssist was created by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It organizes framework controls into a central workspace. It also offers editable guidelines on policies and evidence. Auditors can examine the evidence provided through a purely read interface.
It deliberately does not connect to operational systems, or install infrastructure agents. Customers decide to upload the evidence they want to submit.
Factor System Access into the Decision
The detachment of integrations does not come without its disadvantages: someone must be able to manually collect evidence.
It also eliminates integration setup and this means that the compliance application does not require standing connections to the organization’s operational environment.
Both architectures aren’t universally superior. Which choice is best for your business?
CertAssist is geared towards teams that comprise between five and 200 members and announces its pricing instead of requiring for a sales meeting to get the initial figure. The initial price is $225 a month, which compares to the regular price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Find Its Place
The requirements for a start-up with a staff of 10 are not necessarily similar to the needs of a company with 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is simple an easy platform can be a good idea. As systems, employees, frameworks, and requirements for evidence increase, the financials could eventually favor greater automation. Allow complexity to take the lead when buying compliance technologies.
Don’t buy fifty different integrations simply because they seem impressive on the comparison chart. Pay for them if manually performing the tasks they replace becomes the more costly option.